Hugh Dickins wrote: > so let's CC Ulrich Drepper in case he's changed his mind on it. Definitely not. The test should stay. It does the right thing. Yes, some applications might break, but this is the fault of the application. -- ➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
- From: Stas Sergeev <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
- References:
- [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
- From: Stas Sergeev <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
- From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
- [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
- Prev by Date: Re: [-mm PATCH 3/4] RCU: preemptible RCU
- Next by Date: Re: [-mm PATCH 4/4] RCU: preempt rcu trace
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
- Next by thread: Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
- Index(es):