Re: [PATCH] slim: fix bug with mm_users usage

On Fri, 22 Sep 2006, Kylene Jo Hall wrote:

Nothing to do with this patch as such, but as it went past I noticed

> --- linux-2.6.18-rc6-orig/security/slim/slm_main.c	2006-09-18 16:41:51.000000000 -0500
> +++ linux-2.6.18-rc6/security/slim/slm_main.c	2006-09-22 13:58:35.000000000 -0500
> @@ -529,7 +519,7 @@ static int enforce_integrity_read(struct
>  	spin_lock(&cur_tsec->lock);
>  	if (!is_iac_less_than_or_exempt(level, cur_tsec->iac_r)) {
>  		rc = has_file_wperm(level);
> -		if (atomic_read(&current->mm->mm_users) != 1)
> +		if (current->mm && atomic_read(&current->mm->mm_users) != 1)
>  			rc = 1;

I've not studied your patches, and I don't know what that line's about,
but you appear to be attaching considerable significance to the value of
mm->mm_users.  Yet swapoff (try_to_unuse) has to bump it up to hold the
mm temporarily, as does get_task_mm() used in various places (mainly /proc).

Hugh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] slim: fix bug with mm_users usage
    • From: Kylene Jo Hall <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] page fault retry with NOPAGE_RETRY
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH]: Fix ALIGN() macro
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] slim: fix bug with mm_users usage
• Next by thread: fault when using iget() on XFS file system (2.6.9)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]