On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 04:59:18PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 01:54:38PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > > The readahead code is complex, I'm unconvinced that it has a lot of benefit > > > and Wu has gone quiet. Will drop. > > > > Sorry, I've been putting efforts to meet the deadline of the google > > SoC project "Rapid linux desktop startup through pre-caching", which > > still can not be called success for now. And there's my pending paper > > work... > > Oh, OK. > > That's a neat thing to be working on. Thank you. FYI: I attached a little presentation work, one for the boot time stuff, another for the readahead patch. > > I should be able to come back and concentrate on the readahead patch > > after one month, whether it be dropped for now. I guess it can be > > further improved in complexity and performance. It also needs a good > > document for the overall design and benefits. And sure the > > performance numbers :-) > > I'll hang onto the patches then - they're causing little maintenance > trouble for me. Sorry, I can imagine it, which upsets me. I'll try to settle it in the next 3-month cycle. Thanks, Fengguang Wu
Attachment:
boot_linux_faster.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
Attachment:
adaptive_readahead.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.6.19 -mm merge plans
- From: Diego Calleja <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.19 -mm merge plans
- From: Gene Heskett <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.19 -mm merge plans
- References:
- 2.6.19 -mm merge plans
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.19 -mm merge plans
- From: Fengguang Wu <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.19 -mm merge plans
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- 2.6.19 -mm merge plans
- Prev by Date: Re: [Alsa-devel] snd-usb-audio problems with 2.6.18
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 00/03][RESUBMIT] net: EtherIP tunnel driver
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.19 -mm merge plans
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.19 -mm merge plans
- Index(es):