On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 10:31:36PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>
> I'm still trying to track down the other regression added by
> the crypto merge. I have it git bisected down to a single
> changeset, but I haven't determined what's really wrong yet.
> I should be able to kill that over the weekend. I want to fix
> this before merging my networking tree so I can be absolutely
> sure that IPSEC doesn't break because of something in my tree :)
Thanks for fixing this Dave. I recall being bitten earlier
by the same thing as well. I really need to start testing
on 64-bit.
BTW could you describe the other regression?
Thanks,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[email protected]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
