On Sat, 2006-09-23 14:07:04 +0200, Joerg Roedel <[email protected]> wrote: > This patchset is the resubmit of the Ethernet over IPv4 tunnel driver > for Linux. I want to thank all reviewers for their annotations and > helpfull input. This version contains some major changes to the driver. > It uses an own device type now (ARPHRD_ETHERIP). This fixes the problem > that EtherIP devices could not be safely differenced from Ethernet > devices. This change also required some other changes. First a second > patch to the bridge code is included to allow the use of EtherIP devices > in a bridge. The third patch includes the necessary changes to iproute2 > (support of the new ARPHRD and general tunnel configuration support for > EtherIP). I haven't seen the first submission, but is this driver really needed? Can't this be done with creating two tap interfaces on both endpoints and bridge them with a local ethernet device using userland software? MfG, JBG -- Jan-Benedict Glaw [email protected] +49-172-7608481 Signature of: Alles wird gut! ...und heute wirds schon ein bißchen besser. the second :
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 00/03][RESUBMIT] net: EtherIP tunnel driver
- From: jamal <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 00/03][RESUBMIT] net: EtherIP tunnel driver
- From: Joerg Roedel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 00/03][RESUBMIT] net: EtherIP tunnel driver
- References:
- [PATCH 00/03][RESUBMIT] net: EtherIP tunnel driver
- From: Joerg Roedel <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 00/03][RESUBMIT] net: EtherIP tunnel driver
- Prev by Date: [PATCH 00/03][RESUBMIT] net: EtherIP tunnel driver
- Next by Date: [PATCH 01/03] net: EtherIP driver, header and MAINTAINERS changes
- Previous by thread: [PATCH 00/03][RESUBMIT] net: EtherIP tunnel driver
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 00/03][RESUBMIT] net: EtherIP tunnel driver
- Index(es):
 |