On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 17:06:04 -0700
Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 15:24:47 +0900
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I rewrote the whoe patch..
> >
>
> Well I don't recall ever having seen a "cpu to node relationship fixup
> take1" and I have generally lost the plot regarding these fixes.
>
Sorry....I noticed cpu-to-node relation ship should be fixed before onlining.
About subject, I should be more carefull.
> What I have now is:
>
> cpu-to-node-relationship-fixup-take2.patch
> cpu-to-node-relationship-fixup-map-cpu-to-node.patch
>
> I shall send those patches in reply to this email. Please confirm that
> these are correct, sufficient, complete, etc.
>
will do.
> Do you believe these are needed in 2.6.18.x?
>
yes, I do, becasue my system panics now at cpu onlining.
Thank you.
-Kame
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
