Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.5 for Linux 2.6.17 (with probe management)

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> are you arguing that i'm trying to force breakpoint-based probing on 
> you? I dont. In fact i explicitly mentioned that i'd accept and support 
> a 5-byte NOP in the body of the marker, in the following mails:

Actually that won't work if the kernel runs directly from rom/flash
simply because it's not possible to do any form of binary editing
on the image, as is possible in the more common desktop or workstation
case where the kernel runs from ram.

Karim
-- 
President  / Opersys Inc.
Embedded Linux Training and Expertise
www.opersys.com  /  1.866.677.4546
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.5 for Linux 2.6.17 (with probe management)
  - From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.5 for Linux 2.6.17 (with probe management)
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.5 for Linux 2.6.17 (with probe management)
  - From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.5 for Linux 2.6.17 (with probe management)
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] m32r: Revise __raw_read_trylock()
Next by Date: Re: Fw: [Bugme-new] [Bug 7179] New: Compilation of .tmp_linux1 fails due to missing declaration in net/netfilter/xt_physdev.c
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.5 for Linux 2.6.17 (with probe management)
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.5 for Linux 2.6.17 (with probe management)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]