Re: [PATCH -mm] rescue large xfs preferred iosize from the inode diet patch

Timothy Shimmin wrote:

Looked at your patch and then at our xfs code in the tree and
the existing code is different than what yours is based on.
I then noticed in the logs Nathan has actually made changes for this:

----------------------------
revision 1.254
date: 2006/07/17 10:46:05;  author: nathans;  state: Exp;  lines: +20 -5
modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:26565a
Update XFS for i_blksize removal from generic inode structure
----------------------------
I even reviewed the change (and I don't remember it - getting old).

I looked at the mods scheduled for 2.6.19 and this is one of them.

So the fix for this is coming soon (and the fix is different from the
one above).



Ah, ok, thanks guys.  Should have checked CVS I guess.

-Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH -mm] rescue large xfs preferred iosize from the inode diet patch
  - From: Eric Sandeen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH -mm] rescue large xfs preferred iosize from the inode diet patch
  - From: Timothy Shimmin <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [BUG] i386 2.6.18 cpu_up: attempt to bring up CPU 4 failed : kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:2698!
Next by Date: Fwd: [Kernel-discuss] [PATCH] g_ether+pxa27x_udc compiled in kernel not working
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH -mm] rescue large xfs preferred iosize from the inode diet patch
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH -mm] rescue large xfs preferred iosize from the inode diet patch
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]