On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 14:12 +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > It can't optimize __do_IRQ() out in any case if one uses
> > generic_handle_irq() because of the test in there which can't be
> > predicted at compile time.
>
> Do you realise that powerpc still uses __do_IRQ if CONFIG_IRQSTACKS=y? You
> should probably fix that.
At the moment, there is no hurry as this code is shared with arch/ppc
which hasn't been ported to genirq, so we need to handle both cases.
(Though I'm not sure we ever get CONFIG_IRQSTACKS with arch/ppc ... I
should probably check). The code uses desc->handle_irq and falls back to
__do_IRQ() if that is NULL.
Ben.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
