Re: Smaller compressed kernel source tarballs?

On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:41:15 -0600
Dax Kelson <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> Git users and tarball users are different audiences.
> 

Don't see why that needs to be the case.  Git can even produce the
tarballs once you've synced up with kernel.org (see git-tar-tree).
People interested in conserving bandwidth should really consider
the use of Git.

Sean
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Smaller compressed kernel source tarballs?
    • From: Dax Kelson <[email protected]>
  • Re: Smaller compressed kernel source tarballs?
    • From: Lennart Sorensen <[email protected]>
  • Re: Smaller compressed kernel source tarballs?
    • From: Dax Kelson <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: backlight: oops in __mutex_lock_slowpath during head /sys/class/graphics/fb0/* in 2.6.18
• Next by Date: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.6 for 2.6.17
• Previous by thread: Re: Smaller compressed kernel source tarballs?
• Next by thread: Re: Smaller compressed kernel source tarballs?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]