Re: [patch] clean up unused kiocb variables

Chen, Kenneth W wrote:
> Any reason why we keep these two variables around for kiocb structure?

If there is a good one I've forgotten it.

> They are not used anywhere.

Indeed.

The ki_retried users all seem pretty questionable, too.  How about
removing all that stuff?

> Signed-off-by: Ken Chen <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by: Zach Brown <[email protected]>

- z
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: [patch] clean up unused kiocb variables
    • From: "Chen, Kenneth W" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch] clean up unused kiocb variables
    • From: "Chen, Kenneth W" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [ckrm-tech] [patch00/05]: Containers(V2)- Introduction
• Next by Date: Re: backlight: oops in __mutex_lock_slowpath during head /sys/class/graphics/fb0/* in 2.6.18
• Previous by thread: [patch] clean up unused kiocb variables
• Next by thread: RE: [patch] clean up unused kiocb variables
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]