On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 12:11:25AM -0400, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 September 2006 13:04, Robin Getz wrote:
> > Randy Dunlap said:
> > >ISTM that we should at least fix the first 2 (by EXPORTing them).
> > >or we don't allow INPUT=m.
> > >
> > >You want to send a patch?
> >
> > No problem - which patch do you want? (exporting? or set INPUT to bool?)
> >
> > I'll send the export later tonight if no objections.
> >
>
> Would there be any objections if I commit the patch below so input
> could be built as a module?
Under what circumstances is it desirable to allow INPUT=m ?
I'm having a hard time thinking of a usage scenario where it makes sense.
Dave
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
