On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 16:31:22 -0700 (PDT)
Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Rohit Seth wrote:
>
> > Absolutely. Since these containers are not (hard) partitioning the
> > memory in any way so it is easy to change the limits (effectively
> > reducing and increasing the memory limits for tasks belonging to
> > containers). As you said, memory hot-un-plug is important and it is
> > non-trivial amount of work.
>
> Maybe the hotplug guys want to contribute to the discussion?
>
Ah, I'm reading threads with interest.
I think this discussion is about using fake nodes ('struct pgdat')
to divide system's memory into some chunks. Your thought is that
for resizing/adding/removing fake pgdat, memory-hot-plug codes may be useful.
correct ?
Now, memory-hotplug manages all memory by 'section' and allows adding/(removing)
section to pgdat.
Does this section-size handling meet container people's requirement ?
And do we need freeing page when pgdat is removed ?
I think at least SPARSEMEM is useful for fake nodes because 'struct page'
are not tied to pgdat. (DISCONTIGMEM uses node_start_pfn. SPARSEMEM not.)
-Kame
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
