Paul M. wrote:
> I'm not saying that they can - but they could be parallel types of
> resource controller for a generic container abstraction,
When there are a sufficiently large number of sufficiently
similar types of objects, such as for example file systems,
then a 'generic container abstraction' such as vfs in the
file system case becomes well worth it, even essential.
I'll be surprised if we have enough such similarity between
cpusets and resource groups to be able to find a useful abstract
generalization that is common to them both.
But if someone finds a way to rewrite resource groups using
cpusets and can convince the resource group folks of this,
I'm game to consider it.
Just because some abstract generalizations are good doesn't
mean they all are.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
