Re: [patch] do_no_pfn()

["Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@xenotime.net>]

On 20 Sep 2006 03:25:25 -0400 Jes Sorensen wrote:

>  include/linux/mm.h |    7 +++++
>  mm/memory.c        |   62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  2 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/mm.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/mm.h

> @@ -625,6 +626,12 @@ static inline int page_mapped(struct pag
>  #define NOPAGE_OOM	((struct page *) (-1))
>  
>  /*
> + * Error return values for the *_nopfn functions
> + */
> +#define NOPFN_SIGBUS	((unsigned long) -1)
> +#define NOPFN_OOM	((unsigned long) -2)

Is there any difference in the above and

#define NOPFN_SIGBUS		-1UL
#define NOPFN_OOM		-2UL

?
---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/