On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 10:35:27AM -0700, Don Mullis wrote:
> There's no problem with hiding per se, but rather with the indentation
> level. It's most natural for the user to have dependent options
> indented under their "parent". For an example, in "menuconfig" try
> setting "Compile the kernel with frame unwind information";
> notice that "Stack unwind support" appears immediately underneath
> it, indented. The indentation reminds the user why "Stack unwind
> support" has appeared.
>
I see.
> Note that several of the pre-existing, non-fault-injection options
> under "Kernel debugging", are also broken in this way.
Perhaps you can move UNWIND_INFO, STACK_UNWIND, and DEBUG_FS
entries ealier in the list. It improves improve appearance for
other DEBUG_KERNEL dependent config options like (DEBUG_VM,
FRAME_POINTER, ...).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
