Martin Bligh wrote:
> That was always the intent, or codebase + flat patch if really
> necessary. Sorry if that wasn't clear.
Ah, ok.
> Not sure we need scripts, just a normal patch diff would do. I'm not
> sure any of this alters the markup debate much ...
It doesn't, just wasn't clear on the function duplication part.
> it just would seem
> to provide a simpler, faster, and more flexible way of hooking in than
> kprobes.
Sure.
Karim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
