Re: [patch 8/8] stacktrace filtering for fault-injection capabilities

On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 10:56:28PM -0700, Don Mullis wrote:
> Fix bug in !(CONFIG_STACK_UNWIND || CONFIG_STACKTRACE) case, based on
> code inspection only.  Anyone with a non-i386, -x86_64, -s390 willing
> to test this?

Yes, it didn't work completely without this patch on other architectures.
Thank you.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [patch 0/8] fault-injection capabilities (v3)
  - From: Akinobu Mita <[email protected]>
- [patch 8/8] stacktrace filtering for fault-injection capabilities
  - From: Akinobu Mita <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 8/8] stacktrace filtering for fault-injection capabilities
  - From: Don Mullis <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [patch 7/8] process filtering for fault-injection capabilities
Next by Date: Re: [patch 8/8] stacktrace filtering for fault-injection capabilities
Previous by thread: Re: [patch 8/8] stacktrace filtering for fault-injection capabilities
Next by thread: Re: [patch 8/8] stacktrace filtering for fault-injection capabilities
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]