Re: [patch 8/8] stacktrace filtering for fault-injection capabilities

On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 10:56:28PM -0700, Don Mullis wrote:
> Fix bug in !(CONFIG_STACK_UNWIND || CONFIG_STACKTRACE) case, based on
> code inspection only.  Anyone with a non-i386, -x86_64, -s390 willing
> to test this?

Yes, it didn't work completely without this patch on other architectures.
Thank you.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [patch 0/8] fault-injection capabilities (v3)
    • From: Akinobu Mita <[email protected]>
  • [patch 8/8] stacktrace filtering for fault-injection capabilities
    • From: Akinobu Mita <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 8/8] stacktrace filtering for fault-injection capabilities
    • From: Don Mullis <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch 7/8] process filtering for fault-injection capabilities
• Next by Date: Re: [patch 8/8] stacktrace filtering for fault-injection capabilities
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch 8/8] stacktrace filtering for fault-injection capabilities
• Next by thread: Re: [patch 8/8] stacktrace filtering for fault-injection capabilities
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]