Re: Network performance degradation from 2.6.11.12 to 2.6.16.20

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 02:00:38AM +0400, Alexey Kuznetsov wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> > Please think about it this way:
> > suppose you haave a heavily loaded router and some network problem is to
> > be diagnosed. You run tcpdump and suddenly router becomes overloaded (by
> > switching to timestamp-it-all mode
> 
> I am sorry. I cannot think that way. :-)
> 
> Instead of attempts to scare, better resend original report,
> where you said how much performance degraded, I cannot find it.
> 
> * I do see get_offset_pmtmr() in top lines of profile. That's scary enough.

I had it at the very top line.

> * I do not undestand what the hell dhcp needs timestamps for.
> * I do not listen any suggestions to screw up tcpdump with a sysctl.
>   Kernel already implements much better thing then a sysctl.
>   Do not want timestamps? Fix tcpdump, add an options, submit the
>   patch to tcpdump maintainers. Not a big deal. 

OK, point taken.
It's better to patch tcpdump.

> 
> Alexey
> 
~
:wq
                                        With best regards, 
                                           Vladimir Savkin. 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux