Re: [PATCH] please include in 2.6.18: e100 disable device on PCI error

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 15:01:22 -0500
[email protected] (Linas Vepstas) wrote:

> 
> Hi,
> 
> Please apply the following one-liner patch to  
> what will become the stable 2.6.18.  This patch is 
> low-risk because it affects only the PCI error 
> recovery code, which dosn't run on most platforms
> (in particular, isn't invoked on current x86/ia64).
> 
> This patch was originally sent on 29 June 2006
> to fix a bug that showed up in an -mm build.
> The code from -mm made it into mainline, but 
> this patch did not, and so we're unhappy. :-(
> 
> Here's the original patch description:
> 
> A recent patch in -mm3 titled 
> gregkh-pci-pci-don-t-enable-device-if-already-enabled.patch
> causes pci_enable_device() to be a no-op if the kernel thinks
> that the device is already enabled.  This change breaks the
> PCI error recovery mechanism in the e100 device driver, since, 
> after PCI slot reset, the card is no longer enabled. This is 
> a trivial fix for this problem. Tested.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Linas Vepstas <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Auke Kok <[email protected]>
> 
> ----
>  drivers/net/e100.c |    1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6.18-rc7-git1/drivers/net/e100.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.18-rc7-git1.orig/drivers/net/e100.c	2006-09-18 14:21:49.000000000 -0500
> +++ linux-2.6.18-rc7-git1/drivers/net/e100.c	2006-09-18 14:24:50.000000000 -0500
> @@ -2799,6 +2799,7 @@ static pci_ers_result_t e100_io_error_de
>  	/* Detach; put netif into state similar to hotplug unplug. */
>  	netif_poll_enable(netdev);
>  	netif_device_detach(netdev);
> +	pci_disable_device(pdev);
>  
>  	/* Request a slot reset. */
>  	return PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET;

hm.  I don't have this patch queued, but I _do_ have an equivalent patch
for e1000 queued; what's up with that?  Nobody seems to have paid much
attention to the e1000 fix.

If we can gather the appropriate acks quickly then I expect we can get both
of these into 2.6.18.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux