On Mon, 2006-09-18 at 10:21 +0200, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote: > Fine with me. The stuff that depends on this (and that I care about) > is definitely not 2.6.18 material. There could of course be other > boards where this matters, but they have to speak up for themselves. Largely, they have hacks in their own board drivers (or userspace) to deal with the problem. -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [-mm patch 0/3] AVR32 MTD: Introduction (try 2)
- From: Haavard Skinnemoen <[email protected]>
- [-mm patch 1/3] AVR32 MTD: Static Memory Controller driver (try 2)
- From: Haavard Skinnemoen <[email protected]>
- [-mm patch 2/3] AVR32 MTD: Unlock flash if necessary (try 2)
- From: Haavard Skinnemoen <[email protected]>
- Re: [-mm patch 2/3] AVR32 MTD: Unlock flash if necessary (try 2)
- From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
- Re: [-mm patch 2/3] AVR32 MTD: Unlock flash if necessary (try 2)
- From: Haavard Skinnemoen <[email protected]>
- Re: [-mm patch 2/3] AVR32 MTD: Unlock flash if necessary (try 2)
- From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
- Re: [-mm patch 2/3] AVR32 MTD: Unlock flash if necessary (try 2)
- From: Haavard Skinnemoen <[email protected]>
- [-mm patch 0/3] AVR32 MTD: Introduction (try 2)
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- Next by Date: Re: x86_64 (EM64T Core2 Duo, DG965RY) PCI mmconfig regression - complete hangs on boot - ACPI interaction?
- Previous by thread: Re: [-mm patch 2/3] AVR32 MTD: Unlock flash if necessary (try 2)
- Next by thread: [PATCH] MTD: Fix bug in fixup_convert_atmel_pri
- Index(es):
 |