Re: tracepoint maintainance models

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]> wrote:

> The following example voids your example : there are ways to implement 
> static markers that *could* have access to those variables. 
> (implementation detail)
> 
> int x = 5;
> 
> #define MARK(a) printk(a, x)

but this is only hiding it syntactically, hence the same 
parameter-access side-effect remains - while in the dynamic probe case 
the variable is accessed within the probe - so the true effect on the 
callsite is different. But, in terms of having access to the 
information, you (and Karim) are right that the static tracer can access 
it too.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux