Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>]

* Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> wrote:

> [...] instead of delving further into secondary issues, please let me 
> get back to the primary issues [...]

here's a list of some of those "secondary issues" that we were 
discussing, and which you opted not to "further dvelve into":

firstly, a factually wrong statement of yours:

> [...] any tracepoints have an maintainance overhead, which is barely 
> different between dynamic and static tracing [...]

secondly, a factually wrong statement of yours:

> [...] at the source level you can remove a static tracepoint as easily 
> as a dynamic tracepoint, [...]

thirdly, a factually wrong statement of yours:

> [...] It would also add virtually no maintainance overhead [...]

[see the previous mails for the full context on these items.]

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/