Ingo Molnar wrote: > oh, really? Karim's characterization was: > > " I'm factually explaining the real-life result of resistance to static > instrumentation. " > > so whose interpretation of Karim's comments should i accept, yours or > Karim's? I'm really torn on that issue. (_that_ was sarcastic) Hmm ... this might explain why we're having a hard time here ... me thinks: Ingo don't see that dynamic tracing is orthogonal to static markup and Ingo don't see that my explanation is orthogonal to Roman's (i.e. I did factually explain stuff and did resort to sarcasm as part of said explanation) ... maybe Ingo does not like orthogonal stuff ... That _too_ was sarcastic. Karim - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- From: Paul Mundt <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- From: Karim Yaghmour <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- From: Karim Yaghmour <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- Next by Date: 2.6.18-rc5-mm1 USB BUG: atomic counter underflow
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- Index(es):