On Fri, 2006-09-15 at 13:26 +0400, Kirill Korotaev wrote: > Chandra Seetharaman wrote: > > > esoteric ?! Please look at the different operating system that provide > > resource management and other resource management capability providers. > > All of them have both guarantees and limits (they might call them > > differently). > > > > Here are a few: > > http://www.hp.com/go/prm > > http://www.sun.com/software/resourcemgr/ > > http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg245977.pdf > > http://www.vmware.com/pdf/vmware_drs_wp.pdf > > http://www.aurema.com > have you ever tested any of these?! > there is no _memory_ guarantees AFAIK in all of them except Interesting... > for VMware which can reserve required amount of RAM for VM. It is much easier to provide guarantees in complete virtual environments. But then you pay the cost in terms of performance. I think we should punt on hard guarantees and fractions for the first draft. Keep the implementation simple. -rohit - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Balbir Singh <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Balbir Singh <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Chandra Seetharaman <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Pavel Emelianov <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Chandra Seetharaman <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Rohit Seth <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Chandra Seetharaman <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Rohit Seth <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Rohit Seth <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Chandra Seetharaman <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Rohit Seth <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Chandra Seetharaman <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Rohit Seth <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Chandra Seetharaman <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] piix: Use refcounted interface when searching for a 450NX
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Migration of standard timers
- Previous by thread: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- Next by thread: Re: [Devel] Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- Index(es):
 |