Hello,
> Ext2/3 does erase of inode tables, when do creation of new systems.
> This is very very long operation when the target file system volume is more
> than
> 2Tb. Other filesystem are not affected by such huge delay on creation of
> filesystem. My concern was to improve design of ext3 to decrease time
> consuption of creation large ext3 volumes on storage servers.
> In general to solve problem, we should defer job of cleaning nodes to
> kernel. In e2fsprogs there is LAZY_BG options but it just avoids doing
> erase of inodes only.
>
> I see several solutions for that problem:
> 1) Add special bitmaps into fs header (inode groups descriptors?).
> By looking at those bitmaps kernel could determine if inode is not cleaned,
> and
> that inode will be propertly initialized.
> 2) Add special identifiers into inodes. If super block id != inode id
> -> inode is dirty
> and should be cleaned in kernel, where super block id is generated on
> creation stage.
Hmm, I don't know but how often do you need to create so big
filesystems? My feeling is that one can usually afford to spend some
time with a creation of a filesystem (and it is better to spend it
during creation than to add complexity to the run-time code). Also
having inodes zeroed out is more robust when filesystem is corrupted or
some other nasty thing happens... Just my 2 cents :)
Honza
--
Jan Kara <[email protected]>
SuSE CR Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]