On Fri, 15 Sep 2006, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> This wait is interruptible. However, we have no way to fail "gracefully"
> from no_page() if the routine we use underneath returns a failure due to
> a signal (we use, logically, -EINTR). It's a generic issue with no_page
> handlers. They can either wait non-interruptibly, or fail with a sigbus
> or oom result.
I certainly personally have nothing against adding a NOPAGE_RETRY, it
seems very straightforward.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
