Re: [linux-pm] OpPoint summary

["Vitaly Wool" <vitalywool@gmail.com>]

On 9/14/06, Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com> wrote:
> David Singleton wrote:
>
> > +static const struct cpu_id cpu_ids[] = {
> > +       [CPU_BANIAS]    = { 6,  9, 5 },
> > +       [CPU_DOTHAN_A1] = { 6, 13, 1 },
> > +       [CPU_DOTHAN_A2] = { 6, 13, 2 },
> > +       [CPU_DOTHAN_B0] = { 6, 13, 6 },
> > +       [CPU_MP4HT_D0]  = {15,  3, 4 },
> > +       [CPU_MP4HT_E0]  = {15,  4, 1 },
> > +};
>
>
> Any reason why { 6, 13, 8 } is missing? My lenovo T43 identifies itself as such:
>
> processor       : 0
> vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
> cpu family      : 6
> model           : 13
> model name      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.86GHz
> stepping        : 8
>
> I'm not sure a Dothan B1 exists, but some postings suggest even C0 and C1 are
> valid steppings. I'm sure OpPoint could work with those as well.

Heh, that shows pretty much that the approach itself is not good...
And this is only beginning.

Vitaly
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/