Re: [linux-usb-devel] 2.6.18-rc6-mm1 (-mm2): ohci resume problem

[Mattia Dongili <malattia@linux.it>]

On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 02:38:35PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> > Well, I have reproduced it with gregkh-usb-usbcore-remove-usb_suspend_root_hub.patch
> > reverted too.
> > 
> > Attached is the output of dmesg from the failing case with USB_DEBUG set.
> > It covers two attempts to suspend to disk, the second one being unsuccessful,
> > with reloading the ohci_hcd module in between.  [This kernel also has your
> > other patch to prevent the second suspend from failing applied, but it doesn't
> > help.]
> 
> Okay.  Your problem, and probably Mattia's too, is something other than
> what that recent patch addressed.  I can't tell from the dmesg log exactly
> what went wrong, but I can tell you where to look.
> 
> In drivers/usb/core/driver.c, resume_device() is not succeeding.  That is, 
> the lines near the end which do
> 
> 	if (status == 0)
> 		udev->dev.power.power_state.event = PM_EVENT_ON;
> 
> aren't running during the first resume.  You can see this in the dmesg 
> log; lines 1173-1175 say
> 
> 	usb usb1: resuming
> 	 usbdev1.1_ep00: PM: resume from 0, parent usb1 still 1
> 	hub 1-0:1.0: PM: resume from 0, parent usb1 still 1
> 
> If power_state.event had gotten set to PM_EVENT_ON then the parent state 
> would be 0, not 1.  This is the source of your problem.  During your 
> second suspend attempt, usb1 didn't get handled correctly because its 
> state was set wrong.  (I suspect the mishandling took place in usbcore 
> rather than the PM core, but it doesn't matter.  The state should not have 
> been wrong to begin with.)  Consequently its parent device 0000:00:13.2 
> refused to freeze, which aborted the suspend attempt.
> 
> For the usb1 device, udriver->resume should point to the generic_resume() 
> routine in drivers/usb/core/generic.c.  In fact, this should be true for 
> every device that driver.c:resume_device() sees.  But generic_resume() 
> simply calls usb_port_resume() in hub.c, and the log doesn't contain any 
> of the USB debugging messages that usb_port_resume() would produce.  So I 
> can't tell what happened.
> 
> The patch below will add some extra debugging information.  We need to
> find out why the resume didn't succeed.  Oh -- and of course, you should
> reinstate all those autosuspend patches.  Otherwise this patch won't 
> apply!

ok, with USB_DEBUG=y and this is with your first patch still applied
http://oioio.altervista.org/linux/dmesg-2.6.18-rc6-mm1-verbose-usb-try2

this is without it:
http://oioio.altervista.org/linux/dmesg-2.6.18-rc6-mm1-verbose-usb-try3

I hope I'm not mixing thing too much with Rafael :)

Thanks
-- 
mattia
:wq!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/