Re: - r-o-bind-mount-clean-up-ocfs2-nlink-handling.patch removed from -mm tree

On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 12:12 -0700, Mark Fasheh wrote:
> > Now that the vote call is gone, I don't think we even use future_nlink.
> > Can we just kill this entire section?
> Yeah, good catch. Lets try this one again...

Looks good to me.  Thanks a bunch for updating this one.

Signed-off-by:  Dave Hansen <[email protected]>

-- Dave

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: - r-o-bind-mount-clean-up-ocfs2-nlink-handling.patch removed from -mm tree
    • From: Mark Fasheh <[email protected]>
  • Re: - r-o-bind-mount-clean-up-ocfs2-nlink-handling.patch removed from -mm tree
    • From: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
  • Re: - r-o-bind-mount-clean-up-ocfs2-nlink-handling.patch removed from -mm tree
    • From: Mark Fasheh <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 00/19] Hardware Accelerated MD RAID5: Introduction
• Next by Date: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.4.2.1
• Previous by thread: Re: - r-o-bind-mount-clean-up-ocfs2-nlink-handling.patch removed from -mm tree
• Next by thread: [PATCH 1/7] FRV: Fix fls() to handle bit 31 being set correctly [try #3]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]