Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 02:53:33PM -0500, Mark Reidenbach wrote:
Willy Tarreau wrote:
He may very well have an IOS based 1600 or equivalent doing a very dirty
NAT.
Willy
Willy, I am in fact running an IOS based NAT/firewall on a 1811. It's
IOS version 12.3(8)YI1. Do you know if this version has a "very dirty
NAT" implementation? If you don't, I think I'll just try a few spare
home routers and see if their NAT implementation is cleaner than my Cisco's.
I have absolutely no idea. If they borrowed the session tracking code from
the PIX, you might have window tracking inside it, which might cause what
you observe if it's buggy. But that's just supposition from me.
Mark Reidenbach
EveryTruckJob.com
[email protected]
Phone: (205)722-9112
Regards,
willy
I'm just posting this as a follow-up in case anyone runs across the same
problem I experienced and couldn't find a solution. My problem was the
old Cisco IOS [Version 12.3(8)YI1] that came installed on my Cisco 1811
router I purchased in March 2006. I believe this is still the default
shipping version for this router, so anyone who buys one really needs to
get a Cisco support contract for it from a Cisco reseller so they can
download a new/working IOS [Version 12.4(9)T1 was the most recent as of
this email and was the one I used].
Mark Reidenbach
EveryTruckJob.com
[email protected]
Phone: (205)722-9112
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
