On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 10:36:54AM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Ravikiran G Thirumalai wrote:
>
> ...
> This is not complete. Please see the discussion on GFP_THISNODE and the
> related patch to fix this issue
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-mm&m=115505682122540&w=2
Hmm, I see, but with the above patch, if we ignore mempolicy for
__GFP_THISNODE slab caches at alternate_node_alloc (which is pretty much
all the slab caches) then we would be ignoring memplocies altogether no?
Thanks,
Kiran
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
