Re: [-mm patch] arm build fail: vfpsingle.c

> Yes it does, but the intended use of 'func' (or so I understood) is to
> print the calling function name, not the current function's, isn't it?

Dunno, I took it to mean the current function from the context of that
patch.  I could be wrong, of course.

- z
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [-mm patch] arm build fail: vfpsingle.c
  - From: Frederik Deweerdt <[email protected]>

References:
- 2.6.18-rc6-mm2
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- [-mm patch] arm build fail: vfpsingle.c
  - From: Frederik Deweerdt <[email protected]>
- Re: [-mm patch] arm build fail: vfpsingle.c
  - From: Zach Brown <[email protected]>
- Re: [-mm patch] arm build fail: vfpsingle.c
  - From: Frederik Deweerdt <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [-mm patch] arm build fail: vfpsingle.c
Next by Date: Re: kernel BUGs when removing largish files with the SLOB allocator
Previous by thread: Re: [-mm patch] arm build fail: vfpsingle.c
Next by thread: Re: [-mm patch] arm build fail: vfpsingle.c
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]