Re: [PATCH] i386-pda: Initialize the PDA early, before any C code runs.

* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]> wrote:

> In the process, this removes the need for early_smp_processor_id() and
> early_current().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

looks good to me.

Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] i386-pda: Initialize the PDA early, before any C code runs.
    • From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] MMIO accessors & barriers documentation
• Next by Date: Re: Opinion on ordering of writel vs. stores to RAM
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] i386-pda: Initialize the PDA early, before any C code runs.
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] i386-pda: Initialize the PDA early, before any C code runs.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]