Re: [PATCH RFC]: New termios take 2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ar Sul, 2006-09-10 am 12:20 +0100, ysgrifennodd David Woodhouse:
> But I don't think it's realistic to suggest that C libraries should be
> built without access to our asm/term{bit,io}s.h at all. However, I'm
> only really responsible for the new export _mechanism_ -- I'm not going
> to impose policy except when people like Andi do stupid things and
> sneakily send private patches to undo fixes I've already made.

glibc needs them, nobody else does.

The point I was trying to make is that user space (except glibc) does
not use them. glibc presents a different struct termios to them already,
and it always includes c_ispeed/c_ospeed.

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux