Re: [PATCH] watchdog: add support for w83697hg chip

On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 12:11:56AM +0200, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
> | > +static int w83697hf_init(void)
> |
> | Can be __init?
>
> Nope, wdt_init is __init.

Functions called only from __init functions can be marked as __init. ;-)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] watchdog: add support for w83697hg chip
    • From: Samuel Tardieu <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] watchdog: add support for w83697hg chip
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] watchdog: add support for w83697hg chip
    • From: Samuel Tardieu <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] watchdog: add support for w83697hg chip
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] watchdog: add support for w83697hg chip
    • From: Samuel Tardieu <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] watchdog: add support for w83697hg chip
    • From: Samuel Tardieu <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] watchdog: add support for w83697hg chip
    • From: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] watchdog: add support for w83697hg chip
    • From: Samuel Tardieu <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH 3/3] proc: drop tasklist lock in task_state()
• Next by Date: Re: TG3 data corruption (TSO ?)
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: add support for w83697hg chip
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: add support for w83697hg chip
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]