Ar Sad, 2006-09-09 am 19:19 +0200, ysgrifennodd Marton Balint:
> Please take a look at commit f201f5046ddaeeccb036bdf6848549bf5cb51bb1.
> This commit introduced the usage of the PCI_DEVICE macro, but this macro
> does not set class and class_mask so I think now we set .class instead of
> .driver_data. The drivers that are also affected by this commit may
> have similar problems.
Yes it looks to be the case, and PCI_DEVICE_CLASS() macros don't help as
they assign in differing orders.
The following drivers appear to be broken from this
Aec62xx.c All
Serverworks.c OSB4/CSB5/CSB6/CSB6-2/HT1000
Actual breakage will affect CSB6/CSB6-2/HT1000, and all the AEC6xxx
chips in various ways.
Unfortunately it appears I missed the bug, nobody checked the diff and
nobody ever ran -mm with these chipsets so it somehow got through. I'll
look at rolling a patch but it might be Monday. Until then anyone
rolling a 2.6.18 tree should revert the PCI table changes in serverworks
and aec62xx.
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
