I wanted to note what Martin Mares just raised in the thread "State of
the Linux PCI Subsystem for 2.6.18-rc6":
Changing the device order in the middle of the 2.6 cycle doesn't sound
like a sane idea to me. Many people have changed their systems' configuration
to adapt to the 2.6 ordering and this patch would break their setups.
I have seen many such examples in my vicinity.
I believe that not breaking existing 2.6 setups is much more important
than keeping compatibility with 2.4 kernels, especially when the problem
is discovered after more than 2 years after release of the first 2.6.
I'm not siding with either Martin or Matt explicitly, just noting that
there are good arguments for both sides.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
