On Fri, 8 Sep 2006, Siddha, Suresh B wrote: > > One cacheline sized 128bytes will support all 1024 cpus that IA64 allows. > > cacheline align the cpumask? > > one or more, it is unnecessary for the common case. The common case is an arch with much less cpus. The maxinum on i386 f.e. is 255 meaning 8 bytes. That fits in the cacheline that is already used for the stack frame of the calling function. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Fix longstanding load balancing bug in the scheduler.
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix longstanding load balancing bug in the scheduler.
- References:
- [PATCH] Fix longstanding load balancing bug in the scheduler.
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix longstanding load balancing bug in the scheduler.
- From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix longstanding load balancing bug in the scheduler.
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix longstanding load balancing bug in the scheduler.
- From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix longstanding load balancing bug in the scheduler.
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix longstanding load balancing bug in the scheduler.
- From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] Fix longstanding load balancing bug in the scheduler.
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.18-rc6-mm1 2.6.18-rc5-mm1 Kernel Panic on X60s
- Next by Date: Re: netdevice name corruption is still present in 2.6.18-rc6-mm1
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Fix longstanding load balancing bug in the scheduler.
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Fix longstanding load balancing bug in the scheduler.
- Index(es):
 |