Re: bogofilter ate 3/5 — Linux Kernel

On Tue, 05 Sep 2006, Zach Brown wrote:

> There was a 3/5 but the bogofilter decided it was spam.

Certainly not. The training data you fed into bogofilter data made that
message look like spam. -- Yes, that's a difference.

-- 
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [RFC 0/5] dio: clean up completion phase of direct_io_worker()
  - From: Zach Brown <[email protected]>
- Re: bogofilter ate 3/5
  - From: Zach Brown <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: TG3 data corruption (TSO ?)
Next by Date: Re: [RFC:PATCH 002/002] EXT3: Fix sparse warnings
Previous by thread: Re: bogofilter ate 3/5
Next by thread: [RFC 3/5] dio: formalize bio counters as a dio reference count
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]