Re: bogofilter ate 3/5

On Tue, 05 Sep 2006, Zach Brown wrote:

> There was a 3/5 but the bogofilter decided it was spam.

Certainly not. The training data you fed into bogofilter data made that
message look like spam. -- Yes, that's a difference.

-- 
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [RFC 0/5] dio: clean up completion phase of direct_io_worker()
    • From: Zach Brown <[email protected]>
  • Re: bogofilter ate 3/5
    • From: Zach Brown <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: TG3 data corruption (TSO ?)
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC:PATCH 002/002] EXT3: Fix sparse warnings
• Previous by thread: Re: bogofilter ate 3/5
• Next by thread: [RFC 3/5] dio: formalize bio counters as a dio reference count
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]