On Fri 2006-09-08 17:03:56, David Madore wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 04:41:44PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Well, for merge you'll need to sign-off and put explanation to each
> > patch. Link is not enough, because it will end in git.
>
> You'll have to excuse me for my ignorance: I have some knowledge of
> how git and the kernel work as programs, but none at all of how they
> are actually managed by the Powers That Be. So, what does it mean to
> "sign off", where should I append the explanations, which git
> repository will/might it end in, and how am I supposed to do things
> the right way? I mean, so far I'm just expecting people to read the
> patch and perhaps test it, but certainly not commit it anywhere
> "serious"...
>
> Pointers are an acceptable answer, of course.
And pointer is what you'll get ;-). Documentation/SubmittingPatches.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
