On 8/09, Pádraig Brady wrote: | Personally I don't agree with disabling the watchdog on load. | If it is already started from the BIOS or GRUB for example, | there will be a large window of time/logic that is not protected. Not necessarily: you are free to load the module only when you are ready to run the controlling program. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH] watchdog: add support for w83697hg chip
- From: Samuel Tardieu <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] watchdog: add support for w83697hg chip
- From: Pádraig Brady <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] watchdog: add support for w83697hg chip
- From: Samuel Tardieu <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] watchdog: add support for w83697hg chip
- From: Pádraig Brady <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] watchdog: add support for w83697hg chip
- From: Samuel Tardieu <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] watchdog: add support for w83697hg chip
- From: Wim Van Sebroeck <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] watchdog: add support for w83697hg chip
- From: Samuel Tardieu <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] watchdog: add support for w83697hg chip
- From: Samuel Tardieu <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] watchdog: add support for w83697hg chip
- From: Pádraig Brady <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] watchdog: add support for w83697hg chip
- Prev by Date: Re: [stable] [patch 29/37] dvb-core: Proper handling ULE SNDU length of 0
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.18-rc6-mm1
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: add support for w83697hg chip
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: add support for w83697hg chip
- Index(es):