Re: [PATCH 0/8] Avoiding fragmentation with subzone groupings v25

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 8 Sep 2006, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 17:58 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu,  7 Sep 2006 20:03:42 +0100 (IST)
Mel Gorman <[email protected]> wrote:

When a page is allocated, the page-flags
are updated with a value indicating it's type of reclaimability so that it
is placed on the correct list on free.

We're getting awful tight on page-flags.

Would it be possible to avoid adding the flag?  Say, have a per-zone bitmap
of size (zone->present_pages/(1<<MAX_ORDER)) bits, then do a lookup in
there to work out whether a particular page is within a MAX_ORDER clump of
easy-reclaimable pages?

That would not actually work, the fallback allocation path can move
blocks smaller than MAX_ORDER to another recaim type.


Believe it or not, it may be desirably to have a whole block represented by one or two bits. If a fallback allocation occurs and I move blocks between lists, I want pages that free later to be freed to the new list as well. Currently that doesn't happen because the flags are set per-page but it used to happen in an early version of anti-frag.

But yeah, page flags are getting right, perhaps Rafael can use his
recently introduced bitmaps to rid us of the swsusp flags?



--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux