Re: [PATCH 14/16] GFS2: The DLM interface module

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 18:35 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> Hi David,
> 
> 
> >> >+int gdlm_get_lock(lm_lockspace_t *lockspace, struct lm_lockname *name,
> >> >+		  lm_lock_t **lockp)
> >>
> >> [lm_lock_t is]
> >> currently typedef'ed to void [...]. (One _could_
> >> get rid of it, but better not while it is called lm_lock_t. Leave as-is
> >> for now.)
> >
> >I'm wondering what you might suggest instead of using the lm_lockspace_t,
> >lm_lock_t, lm_fsdata_t typedefs.  These are opaque objects passed between
> >gfs and the lock modules.  Could you give an example or point to some code
> >that shows what you're thinking?
> 
> What I was thinking about:
> int gdlm_get_lock(void *lockspace, struct lm_lockname *name, void **lockp)
> 
> 
> Jan Engelhardt

I've had a bash at this and the results are here:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/steve/gfs2-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=9b47c11d1cbedcba685c9bd90c73fd41acdfab0e

Let me know if thats ok,

Steve.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux