Re: [PATCH] IA64,sparc: local DoS with corrupted ELFs

>>>>> "Arjan" == Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]> writes:

Arjan> On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 12:27 -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 11:24:05AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: >
>> If MIPS and parisc don't matter for the stable tree (very possible
>> - there > are no big commercial distributions for them), then
>> dammit, neither should > ia64 and sparc (there are no big
>> commercial distros for them either).
>> 
>> Erm, RHEL and SLES both support ia64.

Arjan> but neither use -stable.

And getting a patch into -stable tends to be a really good argument
for a backport into the next vendor kernel :)

Cheers,
Jes
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] IA64,sparc: local DoS with corrupted ELFs
    • From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] IA64,sparc: local DoS with corrupted ELFs
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] IA64,sparc: local DoS with corrupted ELFs
    • From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] IA64,sparc: local DoS with corrupted ELFs
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [stable] [PATCH] IA64,sparc: local DoS with corrupted ELFs
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: add support for w83697hg chip
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] IA64,sparc: local DoS with corrupted ELFs
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] IA64,sparc: local DoS with corrupted ELFs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]