Jeff Garzik wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
You mean 2.6.18, yes?
Actually, it looks like it should indeed be 2.6.19 (libata #upstream),
not 2.6.18 (libata #upstream-fixes). Alan's "add compactflash support"
patch isn't in 2.6.18-rc.
So, this should -not- be sent for 2.6.18.
Hello,
Yes, I meant .18. Jeff, this should be fixed before 2.6.18 is released.
It's not the question of whether CFA support is implemented or not.
We're sanity-checking in 2.6.18-rcX anyway and it's the sanity checking
which is causing problem. What seems to have happened is...
1. CFA support is implemented
2. CFA check was added (backported) to upstream-fixes, but it was incorrect.
So, we need to do one of two things.
* apply this patch to 2.6.18-rcX
* remove ata_id_is_cfa() check altogether
--
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
