On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 01:00:28AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> If attacker already has priviledge foo, he can just go use it. He does
> not have to exec() poor program not expecting to get priviledge foo,
> then abusing it.
It is not about attackers. It is about normal usage. If you spawn a program,
it might behave wrong since it does not know that it is priveledged. For
example a network daemon might start a child process which interacts with
the user, and forgets to drop priveldges for it.
> Sanitized here means "all regular capabilities set, all others
> cleared".
Yes, however I thought this was exactly what the patch is not doing?
Gruss
Bernd
--
(OO) -- Bernd_Eckenfels@Mörscher_Strasse_8.76185Karlsruhe.de --
( .. ) ecki@{inka.de,linux.de,debian.org} http://www.eckes.org/
o--o 1024D/E383CD7E eckes@IRCNet v:+497211603874 f:+49721151516129
(O____O) When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
