From: Chase Venters [mailto:[email protected]]
> What are you implying - that SpamCop doesn't make decisions
> about who to
> block and who to not block for third parties? Their weasel wording
It's not an implication, it's a fact.
> I will strongly criticize any service that purports to label
> senders of
> automatic responses as senders of unsolicited mail. The
What would you call it then when I receive a bounce/etc that is in
reponse to a message someone else sent? I certainly never solicited
that.
Perhaps you could send me your snail mail address; I'll solicit some
junk mail but put your address down. But don't call it junk mail when
you receive it, because it was solicited!
> And on the specific issue of autoresponders, I think a reasonable
> compromise is to support DomainKeys. That way if a sender is
> irritated
> that they are receiving automatic responses from messages they didn't
> send, they can personally take action to invalidate the forgery.
IMO one should never have to receive "automatic responses from
messages they didn't send".
> But mark my words: Asking hosts to stop sending bounce messages or
> automatic responses is insane and contrary to over a decade
> of established
> postmaster precedent.
Things change.
..Stu
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
