Re: NPTL mutex and the scheduling priority

On Thu, 07 Sep 2006 11:37:54 +0200, Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> wrote:
> > And ENOTSUP is not enumerated in ERRORS section of pthread_mutex_init.
> 
> POSIX does not forbid additional error conditions, as long as the
> described conditions are properly reported with the documented error
> numbers.

Oh, I see the point.  Thank you.

---
Atsushi Nemoto
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: NPTL mutex and the scheduling priority
    • From: Jakub Jelinek <[email protected]>
  • Re: NPTL mutex and the scheduling priority
    • From: Atsushi Nemoto <[email protected]>
  • Re: NPTL mutex and the scheduling priority
    • From: Andreas Schwab <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: NPTL mutex and the scheduling priority
• Next by Date: Re: bogofilter ate 3/5
• Previous by thread: Re: NPTL mutex and the scheduling priority
• Next by thread: question regarding cacheline size
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]