Hi,
On Thu, 7 Sep 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > BS, even without it gcc can't make such assumption.
> > There is not a single optimization, which would be invalid in a kernel
> > environment and would be "fixed" by this option, so please stop this
> > nonsense.
>
> You are wrong.
>
> Section 5.1.2.2.2 of ISO/IEC 9899:1999 says:
> In a hosted environment, a program may use all functions, macros, type
> definitions, and objects described in the library clause (clause 7).
>
> Since a hosted environment means gcc+libc, it's therefore clear that gcc
> can assume the presence of a full libc if gcc isn't told that it's used
> as a freestanding environment.
Define "full libc".
Explain what exactly -ffreestanding fixes, which is not valid for the
kernel.
byem Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
